Wednesday, July 22, 2009
67 marker test is the most advanced!
FamilyTreeDNA offers a Y chromosome 67 marker test to analyze your surname. This is the most advanced testing up to date and will undoubtedly give you answers to your past.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Mitochondrial DNA is the best method for human migration history.
Researchers at the University of Leeds, UK, have devised a new ‘molecular clock’ that aids dating of human migration history.
Estimating the chronology of population migrations throughout mankind’s early history has always been problematic.
The most widely used genetic method works back to find the last common ancestor of any particular set of lineages using samples of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but this method has recently been shown to be unreliable, throwing 20 years of research into doubt.
The new method refines the mtDNA calculation by taking into account the process of natural selection.
It has been tested successfully against known colonization dates confirmed by archaeological evidence, such as in Polynesia in the Pacific (approximately 3,000 years ago), and the Canary Islands (approximately 2,500 years ago).
According to PhD student Pedro Soares, who devised the new method, “Natural selection’s very gradual removal of harmful gene mutations in the mtDNA produces a time-dependent effect on how many mutations you see in the family tree. What we’ve done is work out a formula that corrects this effect so that we now have a reliable way of dating genetic lineages.”
“This means that we can put a timescale on any part of the particular family tree, right back to humanity’s last common maternal ancestor, known as ‘Mitochondrial Eve’, who lived some 200,000 years ago. In fact, we can date any migration for which we have available data,” he said.
Estimating the chronology of population migrations throughout mankind’s early history has always been problematic.
The most widely used genetic method works back to find the last common ancestor of any particular set of lineages using samples of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but this method has recently been shown to be unreliable, throwing 20 years of research into doubt.
The new method refines the mtDNA calculation by taking into account the process of natural selection.
It has been tested successfully against known colonization dates confirmed by archaeological evidence, such as in Polynesia in the Pacific (approximately 3,000 years ago), and the Canary Islands (approximately 2,500 years ago).
According to PhD student Pedro Soares, who devised the new method, “Natural selection’s very gradual removal of harmful gene mutations in the mtDNA produces a time-dependent effect on how many mutations you see in the family tree. What we’ve done is work out a formula that corrects this effect so that we now have a reliable way of dating genetic lineages.”
“This means that we can put a timescale on any part of the particular family tree, right back to humanity’s last common maternal ancestor, known as ‘Mitochondrial Eve’, who lived some 200,000 years ago. In fact, we can date any migration for which we have available data,” he said.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
My Anger comes from my DNA!
Genetics could explain why some women are more ill-tempered than others.
A new University of Pittsburgh study finds genetic variations that deal with the body's mood management chemistry are linked with anger, aggression and hostility in women.
A new University of Pittsburgh study finds genetic variations that deal with the body's mood management chemistry are linked with anger, aggression and hostility in women.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
